Interactive Theater,
like all kinds of legitimate theater, comes in many different
styles and genres, despite the incorrect assumptions of
some. I haven't seen the two shows David Olivenbaum discussed
in his article on interactive theater in the Winter 1996
issue of the Dramatists Guild Quarterly
and therefore cannont comment on them in particular. But
as I have made my entire living writing and producing interactive
theater for the past thirteen years, I have a good deal
of experience and knowledge about the field and would like
to enlighten my fellow members of the Dramatists Guild.
Ayn Rand's serious interactive courtroom drama The
Night of January 16th recruited audience members as
jurors who decided the play's ending by returning a guilty
or not guilty verdict. It played on Broadway in 1935 and
was very successful at summer stock theaters in the following
years and for the USO during World War II. It would be
fun to see how it would play in Los Angeles today - it
would probably end in a mistrial with all the members
of the jury selling their book and TV rights.
In the early 1960s Nobody Leaves This Theater
featured a band of revolutionaries á la Patty Hearst
taking the audience hostage. This politically charged
interactive play was no more successful then than it would
be today. Who enjoys a night of being intimidated and
having guns shoved in your face? If you want that you
can walk the streets of L.A. for free.
The longest-running play in Boston is currently Bruce
Jordan & Marilyn Abrams's interactive comedy Sheer
Madness, which opened in 1980. In the second act the
farce invites the audience to shout out questions to the
characters on stage who snap back well-rehearsed "spontaneous"
answers. At the end of the play, the audience votes on
which character they want to make the final comical confession
as to who killed the diva upstairs.
In 1985 Rupert Holmes's interactive musical The Mystery
of Edwin Drood hit Central Park under the auspices
of Joseph Papp's New York Shakespeare Festival. We all
know it moved to Broadway the same year and it featured
actors talking directly to the audience and soliciting
them to vote on who would sing what songs by the end of
the second act.
All these interactive plays were produced on legitimate
theater stages but required the involvement of the audience
to come to a final conclusion. In 1983, I took the interactive
play one step further, dragging it out of the theater
and into real locations.
The Mystery Express was performed throughout
a moving train during overnight trips from New York to
Montreal. Capt. Morgan's Mysterious Manors was
performed in numerous locations in the entire resort town
of Cape May, New Jersey during off season (with additional
productions in Castine, Maine and Block Island, Rhode
Island). In both plays the audience had to follow the
characters around to witness various scripted exposition
scenes that were performed simultaneously in different
places. The actors repeated the scenes when new audience
members arrived.
The concept was to allow the audience to experience
a motion picture - to walk through a mystery drama unfolding
before their very eyes, in real time, in real locations.
The murder was revealed the next morning when the entire
audience and cast were assembled into a deliberately selected
cramped space to be raked over the coals by the homicide
detective. Now the audience, as the only witnesses, became
essential in the continuation of the play. Though the
hour-long interrogation scene was fully scripted and rehearsed,
it relied heavily on having audience members answer the
detective's questions, which would lead to his interrogating
a character. The final denouement scene wasn't enacted
until some time later, after audience members had a chance
to interrogate the suspects on their own and examine the
evidence, including an actual scene-of-the-crime.
Both of these productions were serious mystery plays.
They garnered international press with reviews and feature
stories in the New York Times, the Village Voice,
Life, People, National Public Radio, TV's That's
Incredible and Good Morning America, and the
highlight - the National Inquirer. All this was
well before Tony n' Tina's Wedding and even before
Tamara, the environmental melodrama performed in
a real mansion where audience members followed the characters
to witness scenes, but were forbidden to interact with
them.
The massive exposure of these productions encouraged
others to do similar events and "mystery weekends" became
very popular and common by 1985. It wasn't until the late
1980's that mystery dinner theater began. Single evening
productions performed over the course of dinner were much
less expensive to produce and thus offered substantially
lower ticket prices, appealing to a mass audience..
Murder at Cafe Noir, my comic mystery play in
tribute to the Bogart films of the forties, premiered
at the Mystery Cafe of Boston of 1989. The play, divided
into five scenes performed between courses of a served
meal, twice solicited the audience to vote on what the
main detective character should do next. The cast memorized
and rehearsed two different ways to play the scenes which
followed. The audience responded to questions from the
detective in the final act and they even got a chance
to guess "whodunit" and maybe win a prize. The production
was fully scripted (having only one logical ending), featured
two original musical numbers (by composer/lyricist Nikki
Stern) and was performed in and around the dining tables.
Cafe Noir enjoyed long runs in over forty cities,
receiving great reviews and playing to sell-out audiences.
Most of this sort of interactive productions are staged
in restaurants or hotel banquet rooms, run only on weekends,
and can only accomodate around 100 people. Some of these
locations offer better food than any so-called legitimate
dinner theater. My company's Morristown, New Jersey location
is the downstairs room of Il Giardino, an elegant, four-star
Italian restaurant.
Because interactive dinner theater cannot qualify for
not-for-profit status and thus cannot receive donations,
grants or government funding, it must be geared towards
mass entertainment in order to survive. Let us not forget
that legitimate theater in this country began as melodrama
and vaudeville. There is nothing wrong with providing
the greatly needed escapism that the public craves today
more than ever. Sure, there are interactive theater shows
with inane sex jokes, broad characterizations, and actors
making audience member laugh uncomfortably. The same can
be said of Vampire Lesbians of Sodom and dozens
of other non-interactive stage plays. I certainly wouldnt
claim that any one single play represents all plays of
its genre. The eighteen interactive plays of mine that
have been professionally produced do not share any of
the above qualities. (Okay, so there have been one or
two producers that have bastardized some of my plays and
lowered them to banal audiences by hamming them up. But
this happens to all kinds of plays regardless of genre.
We all despair at how little control we authors actually
have over the presentation of our work.)
If it's true that some interactive wedding or funeral
shows don't offer much of a plot in the conventional sense,
we should remember that neither do Oil City Symphony,
Sister Mary Ignatius Explains It All for You, Pump Boys
and Dinettes, Forever Plaid, Nunsense and A Chorus
Line. Should these not be considered theater?
Interactive theater is still in its infancy. It is ridiculous
for anyone to suggest that it will ever replace other
kinds of theater - it was never meant to. The majority
of producers that I have met in this business are interested
more in sales than theater. They will produce anything
that will turn a profit, from cabaret to wedding theme
parties, interactive mystery plays to stand-up comedy
shows. It is up to us playwrights to expand the boundaries,
to discover a bridge between art and popular appeal. I
have spiced many of my interactive plays with tidbits
of social commentary and political jokes with a bite.
The hypocrisy of TV evangelists, the ruthlessness of modern
business, the fruitlessness of political violence, the
needless destruction of the rain forests, and maintaining
one's own integrity are among the themes that have been
highlighted in my interactive mysteries. And believe it
or not, the audience listened.
Interactive theater can and will continue to expand.
In the past there have been the limited box-office successes
of Pageant, where the audience voted on the contestants
(all men in drag) and Prom Queens Unchained, which
included dinner. The lavish Song of Singapore surrounded
the audience in the atmosphere of Singapore in the 1930s
with international intrigue, a musical revue and light
food and drink. My play Ghost of a Chance, which
ran for almost a year in New Jersey and just completed
a limited run in Salem, Massachusetts, involved the audience
in deciding the fate of a ghost who sues a club owner
and his nondenominational exorcist for harassment and
illegal eviction. We even had three audience member brought
up to testify as witnesses - the third changed into a
skeleton in a flash of lightening and crash of thunder.
Yet even in this overt comedy, the closing statement of
the defense revealed that even death can not extinguish
love. Comedy can have its moments, interactive or not.
A few of my conventional stage plays and musicals have
been given productions and workshop performances. But
I continue to write interactive mysteries not just to
pay the mortgage, but because I enjoy engulfing the audience
in the plot, the characters, and the unexpected twists.
Audiences like them because of the escapism and the puzzle
- but even more, because they provide reassurance that
good does triumph over evil, that sense can be made from
chaos and that justice does will out.